<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: January Page Rank Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themakemoneyonline.net/january-page-rank-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themakemoneyonline.net/january-page-rank-update/</link>
	<description>Making real money online with genuine schemes since 2002</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.themakemoneyonline.net/january-page-rank-update/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themakemoneyonline.net/january-page-rank-update/#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>Yeah it's amazing how new sites with at least a few decent backlinks usually end up a 4!  

I had a feeling that PR in general across my sites was on the up because in the last 2 weeks I've had about a 20% increase in organic Google search traffic due to better rankings.  Of course by the time they export your PR it's already factored in so better SERPs and a PR tend not to coincide.  

Like you say it's much better to just concentrate on the SERPs , your keyword positions bring you traffic not your PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it&#8217;s amazing how new sites with at least a few decent backlinks usually end up a 4!  </p>
<p>I had a feeling that PR in general across my sites was on the up because in the last 2 weeks I&#8217;ve had about a 20% increase in organic Google search traffic due to better rankings.  Of course by the time they export your PR it&#8217;s already factored in so better SERPs and a PR tend not to coincide.  </p>
<p>Like you say it&#8217;s much better to just concentrate on the SERPs , your keyword positions bring you traffic not your PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.themakemoneyonline.net/january-page-rank-update/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themakemoneyonline.net/january-page-rank-update/#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>Well i haven't done much, but had changes on two sites only, one went from PR0 to PR4 (the usual mega jump for new sites) and the seo blog went from PR4 to 3.

I was expecting the drop in PR since i lost two PR5 backlinks, but wasn't expecting the PR4 jump for the other site. This time I left aside the PR and was more oriented to SERPs so the PR drop on the seo blog doesn't bug me at all, as long as the rankings on the SERPs improve and traffic grows.

Congrats for your PR3 Paul ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i haven&#8217;t done much, but had changes on two sites only, one went from PR0 to PR4 (the usual mega jump for new sites) and the seo blog went from PR4 to 3.</p>
<p>I was expecting the drop in PR since i lost two PR5 backlinks, but wasn&#8217;t expecting the PR4 jump for the other site. This time I left aside the PR and was more oriented to SERPs so the PR drop on the seo blog doesn&#8217;t bug me at all, as long as the rankings on the SERPs improve and traffic grows.</p>
<p>Congrats for your PR3 Paul <img src='http://www.themakemoneyonline.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
